>More so, it was the '1.5' vs 1.5-RC*. Git doesn't make clear the >distinctions between a tag and a branch. Because git doesn't really >have a distinction between them. What I'm proposing is a naming scheme >to help differentiate between the two.
One shows up under "git tag". The other shows up under "git branch". Assuming we do annotated tags, you can even use git cat-file to distinguish between the two even easier. I'm having a hard time understanding the problem. (The reason I am being a pain about this was that I thought I had a reasonable naming scheme ALREADY in place for 1.5). --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
