> On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> wrote: > > And I believe > it makes it WORSE; each nmh command starts with a brand-new scan of a > folder, so messages added or removed between commands work out fine. > But a FUSE interface would have no idea when an nmh command is starting > or stopping, so you'd have to do a lot of caching or a new IMAP session > for each file access.
That pretty much nuts down the issue. If you want to play IMAP in MH, you must become a full-on IMAP client, playing all those locking games. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
