Thus said David Levine on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 19:59:52 -0500: > Though looking at it now, we should probably move FreeBSD 9, OpenBSD, > and Solaris 11 to the was-known-in-the-distant-past-to-compile > category.
I've heard a rumor that BSD is dead, or at least in it's last throes... Actually, I currently use nmh-1.6 (from ports) on OpenBSD 6.1. I also just downloaded nmh-1.7 and it compiled cleanly. I haven't tried using it though. Does that mean that it should be moved into the ``was-known-in-the-distant-past-to-compile'' category? 1 test failed: *** /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.draft Thu Nov 30 00:04:52 2017 --- /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.expected Thu Nov 30 00:04:52 2017 *************** *** 18,24 **** /9g= ------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0 ! Content-Type: application/x-not-regular-file; name="nulls" Content-Description: nulls Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nulls" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 --- 18,24 ---- /9g= ------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0 ! Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="nulls" Content-Description: nulls Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nulls" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ./test/mhbuild/test-attach: test failed, outputs are in /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.draft and /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.expected. FAIL: test/mhbuild/test-attach Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400000005a1fae3e -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
