Andy Bradford writes: > Thus said David Levine on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 19:59:52 -0500: > > > Though looking at it now, we should probably move FreeBSD 9, OpenBSD, > > and Solaris 11 to the was-known-in-the-distant-past-to-compile > > category. > > I've heard a rumor that BSD is dead, or at least in it's last throes... > > Actually, I currently use nmh-1.6 (from ports) on OpenBSD 6.1. I also > just downloaded nmh-1.7 and it compiled cleanly. I haven't tried > using it though. Does that mean that it should be moved into the > ``was-known-in-the-distant-past-to-compile'' category?
The OpenBSD package will be updated to 1.7 in a day or so. I've been using rc3 for months and 1.7 since this week. > 1 test failed: > > > *** /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.draft Thu Nov 30 00:04:52 2017 > --- /tmp/nmh-1.7/test/testdir/54474.expected Thu Nov 30 00:04:52 2017 > *************** > *** 18,24 **** > /9g= > > ------- =_aaaaaaaaaa0 > ! Content-Type: application/x-not-regular-file; name="nulls" > Content-Description: nulls > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nulls" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > --- 18,24 ---- OpenBSD's file(1) implementation apparently sees this file differently. $ file -i nmh-1.7/test/mhbuild/nulls nmh-1.7/test/mhbuild/nulls: application/x-not-regular-file -- Anthony J. Bentley -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
