Ken Hornstein wrote:
... But ... one nasty problem raises it's head. That is the lack of _time_. We have plenty of great ideas, but those of us who want to implement them all suffer from a lack of time to work on them. Rewriting nmh in Go seems like it would take a long time. Slowly switching from C go Go seems like it would introduce lots of negatives and maybe it wouldn't even be possible. I mean, if people have the time, please, have at it! But understand why some of us are going to plod along with the existing codebase for now.
if we wanted a better code base for the same graying user population, wouldn't we do a gradual rewrite in some well-disciplined subset of C++ instead?
-- P Vixie -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
