On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:35:13 -0500 Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: Ken Hornstein writes: > >As I showed, the perf loss via > >using GC with nmh is tolerable and this is without doing any > >cleanup or code improvement based on profiling. > > Errr ... were there some other messages where this assertion was made? > Because my takeway was that with garbage collection it was MUCH MUCH > worse. Like, "Oh, hell no, of course we're not doing GC!" worse.
There was a fair bit of variability but it was no worse than twice as slow and often close to par. I will try to check this out on a mac and see if I get more consistent results. But to me even twice as slow as a starting point would be fine. The most time consuming op is pick and its performance is more dependent on file reading than anything else. -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
