Valdis wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 07:10:58 -0400, David Levine said: > > It occurs to me that mhfixmsg doesn't update a Content-MD5 header if > > it changes the content. It should, though I don't have cycles to fix > > it now. > > By my reading of RFC 1864, you usually shouldn't need to. And if you > do need to, you're going to need a bigger can for those worms you just > let out of the existing can.
Thank you for digging into this. > So it's probably OK to drop it on the floor if mhfixmsg is acting like > a gateway and translating into different content-type. Yeah, that's what I had in mind, notably when overwriting a text/plain part with -replacetextplain. I only use that for (near-)empty text/plain parts from busticated mailers, which of course don't use Content-MD5. So while a theoretical concern, I don't think it's a significant one in practice. David -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
