On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:02:48 +0000, Ralph Corderoy writes: >Where does one go for exmh these days? Google's top hit is >http://exmh.sourceforge.net/
and that's the right place for uptodate sources. >and that says the current web site is >http://www.beedub.com/exmh/. i'll get in touch with brent welch about updating that version and link on his site. >I considered poking around >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users for signs of life, >but those archives are subscriber only. exmh-workers and exmh-users are very low volume lists, but worth subscribing to. >I found a probable public copy >at https://marc.info/?l=exmh-users&r=1&w=2 and see valdis is active. and so am i (the debian maintainer of both exmh and nmh). >The 2.7.2 I found suggests running a wish script to install. >That doesn't appeal without reading through and understanding it first. :-) that's been the way exmh tunes and adjusts things before installation for decades. it's not awesome. >Debian has a dozen patches to apply, and a semi-hand-crafted >/etc/exmh.conf to avoid running the install program. I'm thinking of >following its >https://sources.debian.org/src/exmh/1:2.8.0-7/debian/rules/ to manually >install here on Arch Linux. the main reason why debian has debian-specific patches is that the debian policy requires particular behaviours wrt. where files may go and so on. some are just patches for things that have been fixed in cvs/git since 2.8.0 went out. regards az -- Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 2FCCF66BB963BD5F + http://snafu.priv.at/ Happiness is the maximum agreement between reality and desire. -- Joseph Stalin
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
-- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
