> This is a pretty complex request and probably beyond the scope of what > most users could configure. All those rules are cool but if you screw > up just one or two and think that you are safe when you're not, it > could spell trouble.
Glad to hear about the Wells Fargo issue. I really am looking forward to using MW. I'm surprised that people think my idea is that complex (although what do I know? I have never actually written any software even 1/100th as complex as MW). It seems like most of the work is already done. MW can download transactions. MW already classifies different transactions based on some set of internal (and user defined) criteria. This would simply (hah! there's that word again) extend it a bit. I guess that I am just an interface nazi because most software seems to miss the mark for me. I actually have a "thinking" box parked on the desk in front of me but I still have to "do" everything myself. It is analagous to power steering. It may be assisted, but I still have to steer - which really seems to shortchange the possibilities we have with such powerful and interconnected machines. The mission statement shouldn't be "make steering simpler"... it should be "get to destination with less effort". All too often I think our software goals are to mimic analog methods too closely rather than think about what the ultimate purpose of the activity is in the first place. Of course, once again, I have never actually written such a complex piece of software so please treat this as a "hmmm... wouldn't it be interesting" comment rather than a criticism. Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No Thirst Software User Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
