> it could only attempt to alter the process around core which is not a very important issue
I don't think that's the *only* thing it could do, in fact I doubt it would do that at all. Though yes, the ASF would do that, which is why I don't like the ASF. It would mean that Joyent as a company is insulated from Node community issues like this one, and that would be a very good thing. It would also mean there's never a concern over a company owning copyrights to Node, which would also be a very good thing (despite their excellent stewardship so far). Matt. -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
