On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:40 PM, // ravi <[email protected]> wrote:
> I readily admit mine may be a minority view,
>
> FWIW I don't think it is - the very vocal majority appears to support
> Joyent's blog post and actions here, and maintaining this status quo. Those
> of us who think Joyent's actions were unfortunate (to say the least) appear
> to be in a minority.
>
Ah that’s likely true, but by minority view, I was speaking both (a) in more
general terms of what is valuable for an Open Source project (not the specific
commit/merge controversy) as well as (b) my old-fashioned distaste for
IDE-centric and monolithic development.
—ravi
P.S: FWIW, I do very much support, more, celebrate, Joyent’s (izs’s) action on
GitHub. I also am, as much as possible, going to try avoiding debating that
here :-).
--
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
