Please recall, this discussion started out with the idea of inducing more 
competitiveness within our league.  There is not 

any reason to start considering resignation because of anticipated league 
changes.  I am fairly sure that is not even remotely 

possible, so bestill your beating hearts and enjoy the season. 

Some Mgrs feel very strongly about issues without quite being able to put it 
into words except, "I hate it". 

So be it. 

If you ask a question, expect a response;  if you made an accusation, expect a 
defense;   otherwise, lets be quiet. 

lets play baseball. 

cubs 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brandt Mathews" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, August 2, 2009 12:12:25 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: yes i hate salary caps leagues? why? 


i also have no interest in a salary cap game and would leave the league if it 
went in that direction. I think for  the most part this leagues rules are 
pretty good. I think thier needs to be penalties for people that don't follow 
the rules but thats about it really. 



  
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:31 PM, < [email protected] > wrote: 






okaaaay- 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Fritchman" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 



Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2009 4:35:53 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: hate salary caps leagues? why? 

i was in a cap league and it wasn't fun. 







On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:43 PM, < [email protected] > wrote: 






how come? 

do you become possessive of your players and hate to part with them? 

the frequent roster changes too stressful? 

like the continuity of having a player for their entire career? 

I would really like to know if you care to elaborate. 

mike  




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Fritchman" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2009 12:24:13 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: "then you would be incorrect" ha,ha- you guys kill me! :) 

i hate salary cap leagues! 


On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:52 PM, [email protected] < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


Please be advised that Ports and myself are currenting in league with budget 
and FA and RFA.  My team was last when I got it and for the last 2 yr still 
last.  So explain to me how this system more the bad team/s better??????????  
As for the best players becoming available well they don't!  They continue to 
sign/keep them and let the other players go and fill in with what's available. 

Sorry but I LOVE/D the old baseball before FA.  Everything that is bad in the 
game today came when Curt Flood won FA for players.  I like/d that my team the 
Yankees kept Munson, Mantle, Tresh, Pepitone, Bearra, etc year after year.   I 
know that some of the others in this league do also but some are too young to 
have lived through that. 


ROBERT 

Please note: message attached 

From: [email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: "then you would be incorrect"  ha,ha-  you guys kill me!  :) 
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:19:20 +0000 (UTC) 


____________________________________________________________ 
Make sure the temperature's always just right with a new thermostat. Click now! 
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsJVCjxkXs45OQBpwTmVmHHy1S75dkt4t57MDBl7WuyZwJT1NjjAsg/
 






---------- Forwarded message ---------- 
From:  [email protected] 
To:  [email protected] 
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:19:20 +0000 (UTC) 
Subject: "then you would be incorrect" ha,ha- you guys kill me! :) 


Interesting theories abound to improve the lowly cubs!  Losing 15 in a row must 
be 
some kind of record, albeit dubious...   
    I am spending $12M of my $85M payroll for Philip Rivers this year...  We 
carry 53 players. 
I am scurrying about trying to come up with a cheaper replacement for him and 
trying to 
balance the team with that kind of megastar on it, and having loads of fun !!!  
Now, I could let him go and he enters the free agent draft and the first pick 
costs 8M, 
2nd and 3rd costs 6M, ... and his value  will be quickly determined by the 
other mgrs... 
I am guessing the max, $8M.  On the other hand, I have to let Joseph Addai go 
since 
he will cost $8M (see they increase every year..) but I suspect he will fall in 
the free agent 
draft to maybe a 2-3M draft pick (injured and not many yards last year)...   
see how it works? 
    The format of having to balance a roster with the players expense is very 
realistic, dynamic, 
and great fun!  It will make the non-carded draft choices even more important I 
suspect. 
Now, imagine you have Pujols in our league.  He is a major expense and grows 
more each 
year...  how to afford him, do you want to afford him?...  Finally when you let 
him go, the  
'stinkiest' team picks him up in the free agent draft for $8M and suddenly the 
stinker may 
be a contender!  I love this recirculation of star players (meaning other teams 
get a chance to 
pick them up).  Otherwise in our league, once you get Pujols...  he never 
leaves until your 
cold, dead finger's rigorous grip finally loosens...  ha, ha! 
    My purpose in this email is not to knock our league's way of doing things 
but to let you see 
another way SOM hobby leagues do things, and possibly how to get more fun out 
of it!  Now,  
change is a terror to some people so I will not propose it for our league so 
don't worry!  I joined 
this league and will continue to follow our rules until my curiosity is sated  
or I no longer find it 
interesting.  But the cubs have a seven pitcher rotation !  Is that not cool or 
what?! 


mike 





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "LOU VINCENT" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2009 7:15:38 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: geneva cubs starters 


And I plan on being a force next season.......................As my draft 
picks are working out & players coimng into their own, like Ellsbury 
etc.......... 

Lou 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: < [email protected] > 
To: < [email protected] > 
Cc: < [email protected] > 
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 7:23 AM 
Subject: Re: geneva cubs starters 


Then you would be incorrect.  Chesp is a good example and by his own words 
stunk the last 2 yrs but has been to the playoffs and in 2005    MELBOURNE 
beat Chesapeake Highlanders in 7 games.  Lou has been the only manager for 
Chesp and if you research his draft this year had the best draft of anyone 
and should be a force very soon for years to come.  He also traded after the 
draft for    Tommy   Hanson, and  Clayton Kershaw so don't tell me that 
teams don't trade but either.  It is true that lately the new managers are 
trading less but that is up to them.  Also teams have changed names 
everything they get a new manager so even if you recd the last 5 yrs only a 
few would have same names so you would be able to follow them.  I have 
listed 07 and 04 and you will see GEN near 500 in 04 but the manager didn't 
like the draft picks and trade them all or most away.  His final season he 
finally realized the value of those draft picks. (I my self had with the 
very last pick of the NOMBL draft pick # 200 drafted Brian McCann!  NOTE: 
in 04 there was NO U stink draft it was something that was suppose to be a 1 
year thing to help only the worst teams!  Bottom line is teams can, do, and 
have gone worst to near 1st but those that put in the effort get the reward. 
This also has to do with how much effort is put into the CMI.  Those that 
don't fill out the chart for each player/pitcher separately have problems 
winning because the bull pen is over used and picked at random to pitch or 
starters can be limited to 6 or 7 IP per start.  However most teams don't 
fill them out and wonder why their pitchers get used up so quickly. 

Bottom line there is many reasons why teams win or don't win. 

      LEAGUE STANDINGS FOR 2007 NOMBL BASEBALL 

PRAIRE                      WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC#   ACTWON ACTLOST 
ACTPCT 
2007 Pennsylvania PEN        98  64  .605 ----  *WON*       111      51 
.685 
2007 Howard HOW              88  74  .543 10.0               66      96 
.407 
2007 Norfolk NOR             85  77  .525 13.0               80      82 
.494 
2007 Las Vegas LVP           77  85  .475 21.0               95      67 
.586 
2007 Oakland BUZ             66  96  .407 32.0                0 
    0   ---- 

CENTRAL                     WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC# 
2007 Chesapeake CHE          98  64  .605 ----     1 
2007 Ohio OHI                98  64  .605 ---- 
2007 Purple PNY              75  87  .463 23.0 
2007 Pittsburgh PIT          72  90  .444 26.0 
2007 Tidewater TID           64  99  .393 34.5 

ATLANTIC                    WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC# 
2007 Rapid City RAP          96  66  .593 ----  *WON* 
2007 North Bay NBS           78  84  .481 18.0 
2007 Sacramento SOX          75  87  .463 21.0 
2007 Portsmouth POR          69  93  .426 27.0 
2007 Huntington HUN          54 109  .331 42.5 

METRO                       WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC#   ACTWON ACTLOST 
ACTPCT 
2007 Virginia VIR           100  62  .617 ----     1         91      71 
.562 
2007 Des Moines DES         100  62  .617 ----                0 
    0   ---- 
2007 California CAL          96  66  .593  4.0               90      72 
.556 
2007 Melbourne MEL           75  87  .463 25.0               99      63 
.611 
2007 Geneva GEN              57 105  .352 43.0               72      90 
.444 

                                                 LEAGUE STANDINGS FOR 2004 
NOMBL BASEBALL 

PRAIRE                      WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC# 
2004 Hawaii HAW              92  70  .568 ----  *WON* 
2004 Howard HOW              80  79  .503 10.5 
2004 Geneva GEN              72  88  .450 19.0 
2004 Logan LOG               69  89  .437 21.0 
2004 Rapid City RAP          70  93  .429 22.5 

GOLDEN ST                   WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC# 
2004 Melbourne SAN           97  64  .602 ----  *WON* 
2004 California CAL          94  69  .577  4.0 
2004 Boston BOS              82  80  .506 15.5 
2004 Eagle Bend EAG          66  91  .420 29.0 
2004 L.V./Sacramento LVG     57 104  .354 40.0 

ATLANTIC                    WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC#   ACTWON ACTLOST 
ACTPCT 
2004 Virginia VIR            93  69  .574 ----  *WON*       116      46 
.716 
2004 Chesapeake CHE          91  71  .562  2.0                0 
    0   ---- 
2004 Norfolk NOR             87  75  .537  6.0                0 
    0   ---- 
2004 Pittsburgh PIT          87  78  .527  7.5                0 
    0   ---- 
2004 Portsmouth POR          76  84  .475 16.0                0 
    0   ---- 

METRO                       WON LOST  PCT   GB  MAGIC# 
2004 Hells Kitchen HEL      105  58  .644 ----  *WON* 
2004 Pennsylvania PEN        94  66  .588  9.5 
2004 South Dakota SDA        94  68  .580 10.5 
2004 Huntington HUN          57 105  .352 47.5 
2004 Clear Lake CLL          49 111  .306 54.5 

ROBERT 

Please note: message attached 

From: Brandt Mathews < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: geneva cubs starters 
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:37:29 -0700 

I think Mike has a very good email here. I would be very curious to see the 
final results of the last 5 years. I would say if the majority of bottom 
teams stay on bottom there is a problem. What I have seen in the last 2 
years of drafting is that a lot of the stinky teams end up spending thier 
high draft picks on desperate need for innings just to get through the year 
and not really getting an opportunity to pick up the players that will help 
thier team improve. I don't know if there is an answer out there but I don't 
think the "pity draft" really helps the lower teams enough. Maybe some kind 
of supllamental round after the first round for teams that have been in the 
bottom 8 two years in a row or something. 


____________________________________________________________ 
Always a good call. Click now to establish your local phone service! 
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/BLSrjnsF3WLsmdOhj0eVgeyMFzisBkiH53iLqKll16K2WGbWkWaFOPSd9wU/
 

























--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group. 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected] 
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en 
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to