At 20:28 09/01/2009, [email protected] wrote:
>I wrote:
> >
> > >And that is why the US is so closely allied with Israel on the 
> Hamas problem,
> > >Minoru. It reflects a common interest in fighting the joint 
> enemy of the day.
>
>And John G. responded:
>
> > Surely this US-Israeli connexion dates back 4 decades:
> >
> > http://badley.info/history/Nixon-Doctrine-USA.event.html
> >
> > I seem to recollect that the National Security Council 
> recommended that Israel
> >   could provide a barrier to Arab nationalism in 1958 (I was still young).
> >
>
>
>Yes, absolutely,

Hmm, but how does the following address my point about the US-Israel nexus?

>  and that (the Nixon administration) is also the time when the Shah 
> of Iran took on much greater importance as one of the US' regional 
> gendarmes, and was much of the reason for his fall (too much oil 
> wealth, too much inflation and corruption, too much money spent on 
> armaments at the US' behest).
>
>My point about the 1950s was that despite the Eisenhower 
>administration's distaste for Nasser (it was considerable; for one 
>thing, Nasser stole money that had been paid by CIA agent Kermit 
>Roosevelt to a corrupt Egypt general and used it to build a radio 
>tower, subsequently called "Roosevelt's erection" (!), and used the 
>tower to broadcast pan-Arabist, anti-US and anti-Israeli broadsides 
>all over the Middle East; 
>http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKroosevelt.htm), there was 
>still considerable antipathy towards Israel at that time too, and it 
>did not abate until Kennedy took office. This is confirmed by Avner 
>Cohen's book "Israel and the Bomb", which shows conclusively that 
>the pro-Israel tilt of US policy dates from Kennedy's time in office.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Persons posting messages to not_honyaku  assume all responsibility for 
their messages. The list owner does not review messages, and accepts no 
responsibility for the content of messages posted.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to