I wrote:

> > I feel no sympathy for the cowardly Hamas bastards that caused the
> > infant to be injured in the fighting.
> 
> The more immediate causal agent would be the party that fired the weapon.

But we do not know exactly which party fired the weapon that injured the
infant. The actual injury is omitted from the video. The only people we see
firing weapons are the Hamas fighters. If they are firing automatic weapons
about so wildly in the close vicinity of the civilians they are using as
shields, a misfire, ricochet or poorly aimed shot could very well have
injured the child, even if they did not intend to do harm.

> Even if we granted that Hamas were using civilians as human shields (which
> is not at all clear to me -- I notice that the videos you've produced as
> evidence have come from the same source, one I never heard of before) I
> would expect a cop who shot a baby in a hostage situation to turn in his
> badge pending inquiry. And he'd sure as hell have some explaining to do.

Naturally. But even though Hamas appears to be using civilians essentially
as hostages, the situation in the video is by no means the same as that of
police called into a hostage situation, where they can assess the situation
at close range rather than from a helicopter doing evasive action under
enemy fire, thousands of feet in the air.

> > Maybe they even shot the infant themselves (you
> > notice that bit was conveniently missing from the footage).
> 
> "Maybe"? Are we to regard your sick fantasies as some sort of evidence
> now?

The callous disregard for the lives of civilians that Hamas consistently
demonstrates does not put such a barbaric act beyond the pale. It is no
fantasy of mine; it is a gruesome, horrible possibility that I wish I would
not have to contemplate.

Unfortunately, this is the horrible world that the Islamic terrorists have
brought us into.

Regards,

Alan Siegrist
Orinda, CA, USA


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Persons posting messages to not_honyaku  assume all responsibility for 
their messages. The list owner does not review messages prior to posting, 
and accepts no responsibility for the content of messages posted.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to