ctubbsii commented on a change in pull request #2569: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/2569#discussion_r829235457
########## File path: server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/conf/store/impl/CaffeineCache.java ########## @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package org.apache.accumulo.server.conf.store.impl; + +import java.util.Objects; +import java.util.concurrent.Executor; +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; + +import org.apache.accumulo.core.util.threads.ThreadPools; +import org.apache.accumulo.server.conf.codec.VersionedProperties; +import org.apache.accumulo.server.conf.store.PropCache; +import org.apache.accumulo.server.conf.store.PropCacheId; +import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable; +import org.slf4j.Logger; +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; + +import com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.CacheLoader; +import com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.Caffeine; +import com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.LoadingCache; +import com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.RemovalCause; +import com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.Ticker; +import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting; + +public class CaffeineCache implements PropCache { Review comment: > PropCacheImpl seems to imply the only one that might exist (too me) I think that's okay. We don't want more than one. If we switch the implementation of one to use something else, that's fine, but we won't have different options for this. It's just an implementation detail. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
