ctubbsii commented on code in PR #398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo-website/pull/398#discussion_r1309435490


##########
pages/contact-us.md:
##########
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ follow discussions as they happen.
 {: .table }
 | Name              | Description                                      | Read 
| Follow | Post |
 
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------|--------|------|
-| **user**          | General user questions, help, and announcements  | 
[<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-search"/> Archive][U_A] | [<span 
class="glyphicon glyphicon-plus"/> Subscribe][U_SU] [<span class="glyphicon 
glyphicon-remove"/> Unsubscribe][U_UN] | [<span class="glyphicon 
glyphicon-envelope"/> Post][U_P] |
-| **dev**           | Contributor discussions and development activity | 
[<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-search"/> Archive][D_A] | [<span 
class="glyphicon glyphicon-plus"/> Subscribe][D_SU] [<span class="glyphicon 
glyphicon-remove"/> Unsubscribe][D_UN] | [<span class="glyphicon 
glyphicon-envelope"/> Post][D_P] |
-| **commits**       | Code changes                                     | 
[<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-search"/> Archive][C_A] | [<span 
class="glyphicon glyphicon-plus"/> Subscribe][C_SU] [<span class="glyphicon 
glyphicon-remove"/> Unsubscribe][C_UN] | |
-| **notifications** | Automated notifications (GitHub, etc.)             | 
[<span class="glyphicon glyphicon-search"/> Archive][N_A] | [<span 
class="glyphicon glyphicon-plus"/> Subscribe][N_SU] [<span class="glyphicon 
glyphicon-remove"/> Unsubscribe][N_UN] | |
+| **user**          | General user questions, help, and announcements  | [<i 
class="fa-solid fa-magnifying-glass"></i> Archive][U_A] | [<i class="fa-solid 
fa-plus"></i> Subscribe][U_SU] [<i class="fa-solid fa-xmark"></i> 
Unsubscribe][U_UN] | [<i class="fa-solid fa-envelope"></i> Post][U_P] |

Review Comment:
   Nah, it's defined as "alternate voice or mood", typically presented as 
italics. There was an attempt with html4 to replace it with `<em>` to 
semantically mean "emphasis" and leave `<i>` to literally mean italics, but it 
never caught on because nobody ever styled `<em>` differently than `<i>`, and 
it was just a redundant tag. I think it was commonly used in html4 to represent 
an arbitrary inline element, because not all browsers consistently displayed 
`<span>` elements that were effectively empty. With html5, that's not really an 
issue anymore, because of the more widespread popularity of modern versions of 
CSS.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@accumulo.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to