[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15227242#comment-15227242
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-2980:
----------------------------------------
so we have a fun called possibly_hack that fixes up local source/target for
_replicate calls but not the equivalent for _replicator docs.
I'm inclined to prohibit "local" source/target in _replicator docs by tweaking
the validate_doc_update function.
To fix this naturally would involve making _replicator document behave
differently based on whether it came from a clustered or non-clustered
database, which might be tricky.
> Replicator DB on 15984 replicates to backdoor ports
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-2980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Replication
> Reporter: Robert Kowalski
>
> If you POST a doc into the replicator database a replication is kicked off
> and finishes successfully (usual 5984 port which maps to 15984 via haproxy).
> The problem is that the DB is replicated to the backdoor ports (15986) and is
> not visible on the other ports.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
