[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15334370#comment-15334370
]
Nick Vatamaniuc commented on COUCHDB-2980:
------------------------------------------
I like 2).
If there is no obvious way to transform "local" sources/targets to remote
counter-parts, I think we should remove "local" being accepted as a valid
replication target or source.
By default local replications in 2.0 would give users the ability to clobber or
replicate out of "system" databases like dbs, nodes, _users which are local. We
could explicitly disallow those dbs perhaps, but even then, it is not clear
what are the use cases for "local" replications in general.
Also, performing this transformation on _replicate endpoint replication but not
on _replicator docs, is a bit misleading and confusing.
> Replicator DB on 15984 replicates to backdoor ports
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-2980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Replication
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Robert Kowalski
> Priority: Blocker
>
> If you POST a doc into the replicator database a replication is kicked off
> and finishes successfully (usual 5984 port which maps to 15984 via haproxy).
> The problem is that the DB is replicated to the backdoor ports (15986) and is
> not visible on the other ports.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
