[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15455101#comment-15455101
]
Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-2980:
----------------------------------------
I'll look again but making "local" names work correctly depending on whether
they are initiating from the cluster port or private port or clustered
_replicator db or node-local _replicator db is a tall order, especially at the
last minute.
That the _replicator database itself can be replicated is an especially ugly
consequence of this regrettable api.
> Replicator DB on 15984 replicates to backdoor ports
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-2980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Replication
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Robert Kowalski
> Priority: Blocker
>
> If you POST a doc into the replicator database a replication is kicked off
> and finishes successfully (usual 5984 port which maps to 15984 via haproxy).
> The problem is that the DB is replicated to the backdoor ports (15986) and is
> not visible on the other ports.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)