[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15455101#comment-15455101
 ] 

Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-2980:
----------------------------------------

I'll look again but making "local" names work correctly depending on whether 
they are initiating from the cluster port or private port or clustered 
_replicator db or node-local _replicator db is a tall order, especially at the 
last minute.

That the _replicator database itself can be replicated is an especially ugly 
consequence of this regrettable api.

> Replicator DB on 15984 replicates to backdoor ports
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-2980
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2980
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Replication
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Robert Kowalski
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> If you POST a doc into the replicator database a replication is kicked off 
> and finishes successfully (usual 5984 port which maps to 15984 via haproxy).
> The problem is that the DB is replicated to the backdoor ports (15986) and is 
> not visible on the other ports.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to