sanpwc commented on a change in pull request #103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/103#discussion_r620247714



##########
File path: modules/table/pom.xml
##########
@@ -74,16 +74,23 @@
 
         <dependency>
             <groupId>org.apache.ignite</groupId>
-            <artifactId>ignite-schema</artifactId>
+            <artifactId>ignite-raft</artifactId>
             <version>${project.version}</version>
         </dependency>
 
+
+        <!-- Test dependencies -->
         <dependency>
             <groupId>org.apache.ignite</groupId>
-            <artifactId>ignite-raft</artifactId>
+            <artifactId>ignite-raft-client</artifactId>
             <version>${project.version}</version>
         </dependency>
 
+        <dependency>
+            <groupId>org.apache.ignite</groupId>
+            <artifactId>metastorage-client</artifactId>

Review comment:
       Why we need explicit metastorage-client dependency? I believe we should 
use metastorageManager instead.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to