> I'd like to focus on what we really need so we can include this as soon as 
> possible for the 2.0 release, and once that is done, take time to create 
> proper bundles for all OkHttp modules and move to servicemix.

As a potentially temporary fix, this makes sense to me and looks good, assuming 
local testing works. In terms of what the best next step would be, I think we'd 
ideally like to upgrade OkHttp to a newer/the newest option for which a bundle 
exists - have we tested that?

Failing that, we would want to open a ticket with Servicemix for them to create 
a new bundle for the version we need, I'd say.

Thanks for taking this on, @nacx!

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Reply via email to