[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16990329#comment-16990329
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-2674:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit c541dab32fc3fbec510f4d1bfced8e2d9a097989 in logging-log4j2's branch
refs/heads/release-2.x from Ralph Goers
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=logging-log4j2.git;h=c541dab ]
LOG4J2-2674 - Change the name of the ConfigurationSource
> CompositeConfiguration misleading configuration source
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-2674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2674
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 2.8.1
> Reporter: Anton Korenkov
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Sometimes we are using CompositeConfiguration in our code. During last
> investigation we've found out that configuration source passed during
> constructor call is 'NULL_SOURCE'. It's a bit confusing because it conflicts
> with NULL_SOURCE definition
> {noformat}
> /**
> * ConfigurationSource to use with Configurations that do not require a
> "real" configuration source.
> */
> public static final ConfigurationSource NULL_SOURCE = new
> ConfigurationSource(new byte[0]);
> {noformat}
> because actually we have a 'composite' or 'multiple' configuration sources
> which will be used later to produce real configuration.
> The question is: do you mind to create 'COMPOSITE_SOURCE' constant and use it
> in CompositeConfiguration?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
