thswlsqls commented on PR #39209: URL: https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/pull/39209#issuecomment-5143247432
Thanks for the review, and for the reproduction guard. You're right — `toBeAlteredTableNames` is a plain list, so the exclusion filter compares case-sensitively while `EncryptRule` keys its tables through `CaseInsensitiveMap`, which is why the old definition survives and the encryptors still look referenced. I'll switch the exclusion to case-insensitive matching and add a regression test where the persisted and altered names differ only by case. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
