On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:20:00 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal at jhu.edu> wrote: > After a conversation with David last year about bug-tracking, I worked > up a rough python-based prototype of this. It worked in terms of > namespaces, so Carl could associate the namespace "public" with a list > of tags he publishes to a http-accessable location. And you could > associate the namespace "cworth" with those same tags.
This sounds very cool, Jesse. Very git-like. I like it. > You type `whatevercommand pull cworth` and the tags come down from that > URL as "cworth.*". > > So what he has as "public.to-push" comes down to your notmuch as > "cworth.to-push". Did you guys try to address the issue of tag removal at all? I've been trying to decide if this is something we need to worry about or not. For instance, if cworth pushed a tag ".needs-review", you would probably want to have that tag removed if cworth removed it. I guess alternatively he could just push the tag ".reviewed" to nullify the meaning of the previous one. I'm not sure that would work in all cases, though. jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110608/22059ca1/attachment.pgp>