On Sun, 7 Dec 2025 16:57:01 +0000 Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 7, 2025, at 10:55 AM, Timur Tabi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 2025-12-06 at 12:42 +0000, Zhi Wang wrote: > >> - pub(crate) fn new() -> Self { > >> + pub(crate) fn new(vgpu_support: bool) -> Self { > >> + let num_entries = if vgpu_support { 4 } else { 3 }; > > > > Instead of passing a bool, and then hard-coding the length based on > > that bool (which would require that RMSetSriovMode always be the > > last entry in the array), you need to do what Nouveau does: if VGPU > > is enabled, then dynamically append the entry to the array. > > Yeah, I agree with Timur. > Hey Timur and Joe: Let me see how this could be solved dynamically. Probably need more changes on other items as well. Apart from this, I felt that we might need a struct GspBootConfig to pass around the GSP booting path, while writing these patches. As we already had coming items, like reserved memory size when vGPU is enabled or not, vGPU enabled switch, also reserved memory size on Hopper/Blackwell in John's patch. It seems we need a central object to host these tuning for GSP booting up. Z. > Thanks. > >
