ignore this..turning into [email protected]
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Josimpson Ocaba <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brett Porter" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2010 1:17:39 PM > Subject: Re: [Proposal] NPanday 2.0 Milestones > > > On 07/09/2010, at 4:43 PM, Liit Padilla wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> With our recent move to ASF, we would like to set some milestones for >> NPanday 2.0. > > One thing I think is worth considering, perhaps in parallel, is a release > within the incubator (without needing to make major changes considered for > 2.0). For example, a release focused on any remaining changes needed for VS > 2010 / .NET 4.0. > >> >> >> Here are some of the things we proposed to be prioritized before we push out >> NPanday 2.0: >> >> >> 1) Removal of the UAC (so that NPanday will be more maven-like since it will >> have only one repository) > > I agree, this (and the RDF) should be the top priority. > > Do you see this impacting the plugins / structure available or the shared > libraries? > > Yes. This will greatly affect the plugins and how the .dll artifacts will be > resolved. I think identifying the the major tasks for this epic issue will > help us speed up on fixing this item. > >> 2) Support for VS 2010 and .Net 4.0 >> 3) Refactor .net source code especially Addin module > > I'd also like to see this split out into a separate trunk, so the releases > can occur independently. > > This will be separate from the removing of the uac then? > > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > >
