Hi all, First congrats on 1.2.1 and the successful move to apache.
Removing UAC/RDF seems to me like pretty major surgery. Could we perhaps get some more point releases out before that work is ready for release? I'd like to get http://npanday.codeplex.com/workitem/13452 into the next release, which I should get committed pretty soon, now the apache move is complete. If the UAC work would be very disruptive, it might be better to do that on a feature branch, while other smaller work continues on the trunk. Then when the branch has stabilised a bit, it can come back to trunk. (forgive me if I'm speaking out of turn...I'm the release/build manager at my work, so I have ways I like to do things :) cheers, Craig (formerly supkichen) On 9 September 2010 00:22, Craig <[email protected]> wrote: > ignore this..turning into [email protected] > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Josimpson Ocaba <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Brett Porter" <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2010 1:17:39 PM > > Subject: Re: [Proposal] NPanday 2.0 Milestones > > > > > > On 07/09/2010, at 4:43 PM, Liit Padilla wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> With our recent move to ASF, we would like to set some milestones for > NPanday 2.0. > > > > One thing I think is worth considering, perhaps in parallel, is a release > within the incubator (without needing to make major changes considered for > 2.0). For example, a release focused on any remaining changes needed for VS > 2010 / .NET 4.0. > > > >> > >> > >> Here are some of the things we proposed to be prioritized before we push > out NPanday 2.0: > >> > >> > >> 1) Removal of the UAC (so that NPanday will be more maven-like since it > will have only one repository) > > > > I agree, this (and the RDF) should be the top priority. > > > > Do you see this impacting the plugins / structure available or the shared > libraries? > > > > Yes. This will greatly affect the plugins and how the .dll artifacts will > be resolved. I think identifying the the major tasks for this epic issue > will help us speed up on fixing this item. > > > >> 2) Support for VS 2010 and .Net 4.0 > >> 3) Refactor .net source code especially Addin module > > > > I'd also like to see this split out into a separate trunk, so the > releases can occur independently. > > > > This will be separate from the removing of the uac then? > > > > > > - Brett > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > [email protected] > > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > > > > >
