----- "Josimpson Ocaba" <joc...@maestrodev.com> wrote:

> ----- "Brett Porter" <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 27/10/2010, at 12:43 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > ----- "Dennis Lundberg" <denn...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Hi
> > >> 
> > >> I feel that 1 and 2 is enough for a release. I'm a big fan of
> > release
> > >> early - release often, so any other features you want to add can
> > come
> > >> in
> > >> a later version. The sooner you get the product into the hand of
> > the
> > >> users the sooner you'll get feedback. Also, having focused
> > releases
> > >> makes it easier to fix any regressions.
> > > 
> > > Great points, we also did have a thread asking everyone if we
> want
> > more constant releases our more features for each release and I
> think
> > that it was leaning towards more constant releases. 
> > > 
> > > So let's just wait for more feed back from everyone, then we will
> > send a summary for the 2.0 Milestones :)
> > 
> > Sorry, getting back to this late after ApacheCon.
> > 
> > I agree with Dennis about releasing sooner - looks like we've got
> good
> > changes to get rolling, and the incubator release process is hairy
> the
> > first time around.
> > 
> > My only nitpick is that I don't think the changes so far represent
> > "2.0", especially if we're not changing any group IDs or package
> > names. Maybe we could call this 1.3-incubating, and reserve 2.0 for
> > the following:
> > - RDF removal / alignment to Maven resolution mechanism
> > - refactoring the plugins inline with that
> > - split the VS integration into a separate release
> > - multi-language support
> > 
> > WDYT?
> 
> I'm ok with having the current trunk to be 1.3-incubating. I do feel
> that 2.0 as was planned way before should have alot more than what we
> have right now. 
> 
> So maybe once we have the trunk stabilized again we can do that
> 1.3-incubating?
> 


I'm ok with 1.3-incubating after we've stabilized trunk.


>  
> > Cheers,
> > Brett
> > 
> > --
> > Brett Porter
> > br...@apache.org
> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/


Thanks,

liit

Reply via email to