There's a further topic for discussion. What does anyone claim "Trad
C/C" means? I suspect there are people on this list who will disagree
with me, but I think the statement 'Trad C/C' is usually a nonsense
statement. It's either one or the other. It can't be both. Copyright
has to belong to someone.
By calling something 'trad', in effect, a person is saying they do not
believe there is anyone who has copyright in it. They aren't expecting
to pay royalties for using it, or that someone will leap out of the
woodwork who can claim them. A different copyright exists in the actual
recording, but you do not give yourself copyright in a piece of music
that comes from somewhere else just by finding it on a grubby piece of
lined paper, hearing it in a session or playing it. You can only get
such a copyright by tracing who wrote it, finding them or their
executors, being able to show that their copyright has not expired and
persuading them to sell it to you.
As for Jimmy Allen, one cannot prove that it was ancient from a
negative, but it does look as though there was no one around in the
1960s or 1970s who claimed that they or their ancestor wrote it. If
this reasoning were valid, which it isn't, it would be persuasive that
if anyone once wrote it, they died before about 1900. It doesn't,
though, unfortunately, provide any direct link to someone who died in
1810.
Dru
On 15 Jan 2009, at 20:18, Ian Lawther wrote:
Copyright control(led)? Often abbreviated to "Cop. Con"
Ian
[email protected] wrote:
On the vinyl itself it is not directly attributed, other than:
{All other material Trad C/C)
?
Not sure what C/C means
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
