This talk of drone tuning reminded me of something.
Some years ago, someone on this list directed us to a website which had (I hope I can explain this and make sense) a keynote playing and you had to use sliders to tune the drones (using the mouse) and got a score for how near you were (it was an aid to tuning by ear) and showed how far out you were (I think it also had a "this is how it should sound" audio as well).
Anyone remember it (I lost the URL several PCs ago) and does it still exist?

Colin Hill
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gibbons, John" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 12:11 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: Drone Tuning



Anthony,

Certainly adding drones on the 2nd time through, works well on UP, especially on airs. Irish slow airs, being usually vocal music rather than pipe music, maybe don't require a drone so fundamentally. Musically this idea makes less sense on drone music though - double-tonic tunes etc. But with NSP, it is rare to have an on-off drone key, so it is hard for us to do in practice.

As for drones being out of tune on recordings - as I said, it is the effect on the listener which matters. I can think of an otherwise excellent recording where the drones were badly out in places, so I know what you mean.
But shutting them off is a cop-out, not a solution.

John






-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Robb
Sent: 07 January 2011 10:52
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Gibbons, John
Subject: [NSP] Re: Concertina Tuning


  What you say is true, but still ignores Paddy Maloney's point of adding
  drones further into (even 'proper') pipes tunes for greater impact.
  We also have to remember that out of tune drones (and this
  unfortunately is the norm it seems to me) do little to enhance the
  music. This is true even in the most surprising quarters i.e. modern
  recordings where retakes could be done fairly easily to correct this.
  Yes drones are wonderful and powerful but this power can also be, and
  all too often is, destructive.
  Anthony
  --- On Fri, 7/1/11, Gibbons, John <[email protected]> wrote:

    From: Gibbons, John <[email protected]>
    Subject: [NSP] Re: Concertina Tuning
    To: "'Anthony Robb'" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
    <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
    <[email protected]>
    Date: Friday, 7 January, 2011, 10:17

  Not at all - but pipes do sound better with drones, which are a
  fundamental part of the instrument,
  and also of what we might call 'proper' pipe music.
  There are some tunes where drones don't work,
  and some multi-instrument arrangements where they might get in the way,
  but - on pipe tunes at least - there is a price to pay if you shut them
  off.
  My warning was just to your more literal-minded readers out there,
  who might not think about the effect of their music on listeners.
  John
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [1][email protected]
  [mailto:[2][email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Robb
  Sent: 07 January 2011 09:48
  To: [3][email protected]; [4][email protected]; Gibbons,
  John
  Subject: [NSP] Re: Concertina Tuning
     John, please remember I was  talking in the context of switching off
     drones to let the music shine forth, not silly things like playing a
     semitone above everyone else!
     Many general music sessions involve key changes from G to D to A.
     Are you saying that pipes should not be adding their crystalline
     punchiness to the mix just because they have to be droneless?
     Cheers
     Anthony
     --- On Thu, 6/1/11, Gibbons, John <[5][email protected]>
  wrote:
       From: Gibbons, John <[6][email protected]>
       Subject: RE: [NSP] Re: Concertina Tuning
       To: "Anthony Robb" <[7][email protected]>,
  "[8][email protected]"
       <[9][email protected]>, "[10][email protected]"
       <[11][email protected]>
       Date: Thursday, 6 January, 2011, 20:50
     "Others may not like it but at least you'll be pleasing the most
     important person in this whole process, namely yourself. Which is I
     would argue is the main purpose of traditional music."
     Pleasing everyone else in the room might be a priority for some, as
     well!
     I have heard too many so-called traditional musicians play to please
     themselves (and nobody else) not to add this health warning.
     You get them everywhere, but I recall the bloke who wound his flute
  up
     to E flat because that's the key Matt Molloy played in,
     though everyone else in the session was in D, and the one who played
     faster than everyone else because it was more exciting.
     I've been the latter one myself on occasion....
     Think about how it sounds for the rest of the world, and you will
  play
     better.
     John
     ________________________________________
     From: [1][12][email protected]
  [[2][13][email protected]] On
     Behalf Of Anthony Robb [[3][14][email protected]]
     Sent: 06 January 2011 18:19
     To: [4][15][email protected]; [5][16][email protected]
     Subject: [NSP] Re: Concertina Tuning
        --- On Thu, 6/1/11, [6][17][email protected]
        <[7][18][email protected]> wrote:
        It's a case of trying and seeing what you like. The other way
  round
        this would be for the piper not to play drones ... but I wouldn't
        recommend that approach.
        cheers
        Rob
        Sorry to disagree, Rob, but occasionally switching the drones off
  to
        let other instruments provide the accompaniment can be lovely. I
     would
        also recommend learning and practising mainly on the chanter
  alone.
     It
        is the way I was taught and was the Colin Caisley way presumably
     passed
        on from Tom Clough. When Colin Caisley was chairman of the NPS in
     the
        60s the Society hired out a 'goose' (bellows, bag and chanter
  only)
     for
        people to try out the pipes.
        Recently I came across an article, from the 70s I guess, written
  by
        Paddy Maloney who suggests uillean pipers should learn on a
  'goose'
     for
        3 to 4 years before thinking about getting drones. The premise
  being
        that the chanter is where the music is created and so needs to be
        learnt before adding drones or regulators. He also extols the
  beauty
        and effectiveness of playing parts of a piece on solo chanter
  only
     and
        then adding accompaniment be it drones or other instruments to
  lift
     the
        sound.
        On a slightly related topic, people have commented on how well in
     tune
        the 3 beginner pipers in Windy Gyle Band play on the CD and have
        suggested that some digital trickery might be involved. This is
        absolutely not the case. All three have learnt to play on chanter
     only
        and two of them are now (after 3 years) beginning to add drones
        occasionally.
        The drones can add excitement like nothing else to the pipes
  sound
     but
        they can also mask some of the music at times. So my message
  would
     be
        follow your ears, try all the options and go with what works for
     you.
        Others may not like it but at least you'll be pleasing the most
        important person in this whole process, namely yourself. Which is
  I
        would argue is the main purpose of traditional music.
        Cheers
        Anthony
        --- On Thu, 6/1/11, [8][19][email protected]
        <[9][20][email protected]> wrote:
        To get on or off this list see list information at
        [1][10][21]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        --
     References
        1. [11][22]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     --
  References
     1.
  [23]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  u
     2.
  [24]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  u
     3.
  [25]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     4.
  [26]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     5.
  [27]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected].
  uk
     6.
  [28]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected].
  uk
     7.
  [29]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected].
  uk
     8.
  [30]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected].
  uk
     9.
  [31]http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected].
  uk
    10. [32]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    11. [33]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

  --

References

  1. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  2. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  3. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  4. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  5. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  6. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  7. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  8. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  9. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 10. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 11. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 12. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 13. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 14. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 15. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 16. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 17. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 18. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 19. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 20. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 21. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 22. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 23. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 24. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 25. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 26. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 27. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 28. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 29. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 30. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 31. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
 32. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 33. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html









Reply via email to