Steve Bull anyone? Or maybe Bull & Ince. (sounds like the name of a pub)
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a replacement for Mick though. I > don't see the point of sacking Mick until we have an idea about who could > come in. It's like people that moan about the government but don't vote. > > > > On 4 October 2010 09:50, Jeremy Tonks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think he meant William (Lee) Morris >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 9:49 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call [sec=unclassified] >> >> >> >> Did you mean William Hill? I can't find the odds on there. >> >> On 4 October 2010 09:45, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Google is an amazing tool...lol >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> >> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 08:44 >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call [sec=unclassified] >> >> >> >> The nineteenth century English textile designer? >> >> On 4 October 2010 09:41, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> William Morris's >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> >> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 08:40 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call [sec=unclassified] >> >> Where are the odds from? >> >> On 4 October 2010 09:39, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hoddle has a lot of recent experience at failing, no chance...if O'neil is >> 30/1 Hoddle must be triple that. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> >> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 08:37 >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> Irrelevant. Mick is the manager. O'Neill won't come. If there is a >> change it needs to be someone with a lot of experience and a football >> brain. Hoddle for example. >> >> On 4 October 2010 09:30, Jeremy Tonks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think that’s a Furfy… The Villa fans I know all criticised for NOT >> spending the money that was available – he signed no one in the offseason. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of mark worrall >> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 9:14 AM >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> >> Subject: RE: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> Martin O'Neil, erm, he walked out on Villa because they wouldn't give him >> enough money to spend, so do we really think Wolves could give him what he'd >> want for players ? >> >> >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of paul >> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 8:17 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> The sooner we appoint Martin O'Neil the better! >> >> MM is out of his depth, time for a change in a few games time if this bad >> run continues. >> >> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: "Jeremy Tonks" <[email protected]> >> >> Sender: [email protected] >> >> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:56:35 +1100 >> >> To: <[email protected]> >> >> ReplyTo: [email protected] >> >> Subject: RE: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> Well we can’t sink too much lower (the only team below are my beloved >> Saddlers in League One L) >> >> >> >> We do need to beat West Ham. Disappointed that Everton won – one of my >> mate’s here is a Toff. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 2:05 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> He was forced to retire after losing his left foot in a helicopter crash. >> That's true too. >> >> It's only me and you left now Jeremy. Paul Crowe joined the dark side >> last week when Wolves denied him his nookie. I'm not sure about Matt >> Leese. I think he might be on the turn. >> >> On 3 October 2010 12:06, Jeremy Tonks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Who’s Roy playing for these days – are Melchester still in Europe? >> >> He’s about the only person I can see who’d be better than MM (that we >> could attract). >> >> I’m not signing up for the BTMO club any time soon. >> >> >> >> I’m glad I didn’t have to watch last night! We’re certainly not good >> enough to play anyone with only 10men for 80mins. >> >> >> >> JT >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 11:44 AM >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> I'm generally positive about Wolves as I've got more than I hoped for from >> them and I'm enjoying our spell in the Premiership. We survived last season >> and we might survive this season. A win against West Ham and a point off >> one of the top four and we'll be OK. >> >> I don't see how we can expect to win games with ten men for most of the >> match. It's hard enough in this league with eleven. It was a poor >> performance but what did everyone expect? Some kind or Roy Of The Rovers >> miracle where someone scores a last gasp winner having played on with two >> broken legs. >> >> On 3 October 2010 11:33, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> And here was me thinking alcohol made you see things in a more positive >> light? Seems you are the reverse Steve. If you can find positives out of >> last night when you are sober then I suggest you give up alcohol altogether >> and become the patron saint of optimism. >> >> I guess we could aim for Championship Champions again next season and we >> won't have to worry about having Keogh's mug on the front of the >> commemorative t-shirt. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> >> Sent: Sun Oct 03 11:26:54 2010 >> >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> Sorry, Rog, having sobered up, I'm withdrawing my application for the BTMO >> club, and I'm going to continue to support our most successful manager in a >> quarter of a century. For a small club like Wolves, a couple of seasons in >> the Premiership is more than I really expected so I'm grateful to Mick for >> that. >> >> Out of darkness cometh light. We'll come good. >> >> On 3 October 2010 09:16, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Oh yes I have. >> >> At the moment I’d suggest 5 year old work experience Inuit who’s never >> seen tarmac would do a far better job than the present fool. >> >> >> >> Didn’t think I’d ever see anything worse than the game against a dire >> Blackburn last season. >> >> WRONG, WRONG, ****ING TOTALLY ***ING WRONG. >> >> Wigan were even worse than Blackburn and that’s saying a bloody big >> something. >> >> >> >> We started off so positively as well last night, Mick must have been >> wearing his reckless hat all week. >> >> Against Villa we passed it back to Hahnemann 3 times in the first 3 >> minutes. >> >> Last night it was 3 passes in the first 4 minutes. >> >> Only 2 passes back to him straight from kick offs. >> >> >> >> On a positive note it’s great you’ve finally seen through the hapless, >> hopeless joke Steve. >> >> Was starting to worry about your extremely serious lack of judgement. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 12:14 AM >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> Boo. Thick Mick Out. >> >> Bad substitutions although Henry's tackle was ridiculous. A great free >> kick and an own goal is hardly a big endorsement for Wigan. >> >> Who's the new manager Rog? You never suggest anyone. >> >> On 2 October 2010 23:33, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Trust the "We Love Mick" brigade enjoyed this performance. >> >> Get that thick yorkshire twat out of our club! BTMO! >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sat Oct 02 15:35:25 2010 >> >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> Starting in the Porterhouse about eight o'clock tonight >> >> It's on the corner of Riley St and Campbell St in Surry Hills, a short >> walk from Central. >> >> Everyone welcome, including BTMO members. >> >> On 30 September 2010 14:58, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Royal Exhibition (not Exchange) the venue that we used for our monthly >> meetings. >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> Sent: Thursday, 30 September 2010 1:32 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> It's the one opposite central that we used to meet in on a Wednesday. >> Dunno the street. >> >> On 30 September 2010 08:43, Paul Crowe <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Morning Steve, >> >> >> >> I have my Gladesville Sharks football end of season get together on >> Saturday, hence my attempt to move the venue. >> >> >> >> If not too pissed, as I am golfing in the afternoon as well, I will try to >> make it over to the Royal Exchange. What street is the Pub on please? >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> Paul. >> >> >> >> Paul Crowe >> >> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific >> >> >> >> ConTech (Sydney Office) >> >> >> >> PO Box 3517 >> >> Rhodes Waterside >> >> Rhodes NSW 2138 >> >> Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 >> >> Mob: 0406009562 >> >> Email: [email protected] >> >> Website: www.contechengineering.com >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Steven Millward >> >> Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2010 10:02 PM >> To: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> >> >> >> Not much interest from the group Jimmy. I think BTMO might having their >> own wake for this one. >> >> Let's say the RE is the venue for the game and I'll sort something out >> with you, Matt and Elliot for a few pre drinks >> >> On 29 September 2010 16:30, james graves <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> i'm happy to meet somewhere first for a couple,then royal ex for the game >> ,and if the doormen let me in,a couple for the road some place else... >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:05:14 +1000 >> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >> From: [email protected] >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Two ideas >> >> >> >> Royal Exhibition >> >> Glenmore >> >> >> >> Matt says that they will put the sound on in the Exhibition, but that it >> will be quiet. Glenmore will be more lively but do they show games with >> sound now it's been ponced up? >> >> On 28 September 2010 09:58, Paul Butcher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Can't make Saturday guys as I'm in Melbourne for the weekend........ >> enjoy >> >> On Sep 27, 5:44 pm, james graves <[email protected]> wrote: >> > i'm up for a few beers. >> > >> > Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:58:36 +1000 >> > Subject: [BTMO] Wigan - Roll Call >> >> > From: [email protected] >> >> > To: [email protected] >> > >> > Who's coming out for this on Saturday? >> > >> > Confirmed: >> > >> > Steve M >> > Elliot >> > Matt L >> > Paul C >> > >> > Anyone else? Venue to be confirmed based on who is coming. >> > -- >> > Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not >> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this >> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee >> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions >> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of >> Macquarie. >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Q: Why is this email three sentences or less? A: http://three.sentenc.es -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
