Sorry - I couldn't resist stiring.... On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve, if it wasn't for the right reverend Mr Tonks I'd say "For Christ Sake > No"...lol > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Steve Dalton > Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 16:23 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call [sec=unclassified] > > Steve Bull anyone? > Or maybe Bull & Ince. > (sounds like the name of a pub) > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a replacement for Mick >> though. I don't see the point of sacking Mick until we have an idea >> about who could come in. It's like people that moan about the government >> but don't vote. >> >> >> >> On 4 October 2010 09:50, Jeremy Tonks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think he meant William (Lee) Morris >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 9:49 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call [sec=unclassified] >>> >>> >>> >>> Did you mean William Hill? I can't find the odds on there. >>> >>> On 4 October 2010 09:45, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Google is an amazing tool...lol >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> >>> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 08:44 >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call [sec=unclassified] >>> >>> >>> >>> The nineteenth century English textile designer? >>> >>> On 4 October 2010 09:41, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> William Morris's >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> >>> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 08:40 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call [sec=unclassified] >>> >>> Where are the odds from? >>> >>> On 4 October 2010 09:39, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hoddle has a lot of recent experience at failing, no chance...if >>> O'neil is >>> 30/1 Hoddle must be triple that. >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> >>> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 08:37 >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> Irrelevant. Mick is the manager. O'Neill won't come. If there is a >>> change it needs to be someone with a lot of experience and a football >>> brain. Hoddle for example. >>> >>> On 4 October 2010 09:30, Jeremy Tonks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think that's a Furfy... The Villa fans I know all criticised for NOT >>> spending the money that was available - he signed no one in the offseason. >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of mark worrall >>> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 9:14 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> Subject: RE: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> Martin O'Neil, erm, he walked out on Villa because they wouldn't give >>> him enough money to spend, so do we really think Wolves could give >>> him what he'd want for players ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of paul >>> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 8:17 PM >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> The sooner we appoint Martin O'Neil the better! >>> >>> MM is out of his depth, time for a change in a few games time if this >>> bad run continues. >>> >>> Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: "Jeremy Tonks" <[email protected]> >>> >>> Sender: [email protected] >>> >>> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:56:35 +1100 >>> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> >>> ReplyTo: [email protected] >>> >>> Subject: RE: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> Well we can't sink too much lower (the only team below are my beloved >>> Saddlers in League One L) >>> >>> >>> >>> We do need to beat West Ham. Disappointed that Everton won - one of >>> my mate's here is a Toff. >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 2:05 PM >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> He was forced to retire after losing his left foot in a helicopter crash. >>> That's true too. >>> >>> It's only me and you left now Jeremy. Paul Crowe joined the dark >>> side last week when Wolves denied him his nookie. I'm not sure about >>> Matt Leese. I think he might be on the turn. >>> >>> On 3 October 2010 12:06, Jeremy Tonks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Who's Roy playing for these days - are Melchester still in Europe? >>> >>> He's about the only person I can see who'd be better than MM (that we >>> could attract). >>> >>> I'm not signing up for the BTMO club any time soon. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm glad I didn't have to watch last night! We're certainly not good >>> enough to play anyone with only 10men for 80mins. >>> >>> >>> >>> JT >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 11:44 AM >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm generally positive about Wolves as I've got more than I hoped for >>> from them and I'm enjoying our spell in the Premiership. We survived >>> last season and we might survive this season. A win against West Ham >>> and a point off one of the top four and we'll be OK. >>> >>> I don't see how we can expect to win games with ten men for most of >>> the match. It's hard enough in this league with eleven. It was a >>> poor performance but what did everyone expect? Some kind or Roy Of >>> The Rovers miracle where someone scores a last gasp winner having >>> played on with two broken legs. >>> >>> On 3 October 2010 11:33, Marcus Chantry >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> And here was me thinking alcohol made you see things in a more >>> positive light? Seems you are the reverse Steve. If you can find >>> positives out of last night when you are sober then I suggest you >>> give up alcohol altogether and become the patron saint of optimism. >>> >>> I guess we could aim for Championship Champions again next season and >>> we won't have to worry about having Keogh's mug on the front of the >>> commemorative t-shirt. >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> >>> Sent: Sun Oct 03 11:26:54 2010 >>> >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> Sorry, Rog, having sobered up, I'm withdrawing my application for the >>> BTMO club, and I'm going to continue to support our most successful >>> manager in a quarter of a century. For a small club like Wolves, a >>> couple of seasons in the Premiership is more than I really expected >>> so I'm grateful to Mick for that. >>> >>> Out of darkness cometh light. We'll come good. >>> >>> On 3 October 2010 09:16, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Oh yes I have. >>> >>> At the moment I'd suggest 5 year old work experience Inuit who's >>> never seen tarmac would do a far better job than the present fool. >>> >>> >>> >>> Didn't think I'd ever see anything worse than the game against a dire >>> Blackburn last season. >>> >>> WRONG, WRONG, ****ING TOTALLY ***ING WRONG. >>> >>> Wigan were even worse than Blackburn and that's saying a bloody big >>> something. >>> >>> >>> >>> We started off so positively as well last night, Mick must have been >>> wearing his reckless hat all week. >>> >>> Against Villa we passed it back to Hahnemann 3 times in the first 3 >>> minutes. >>> >>> Last night it was 3 passes in the first 4 minutes. >>> >>> Only 2 passes back to him straight from kick offs. >>> >>> >>> >>> On a positive note it's great you've finally seen through the >>> hapless, hopeless joke Steve. >>> >>> Was starting to worry about your extremely serious lack of judgement. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 12:14 AM >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> Boo. Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> Bad substitutions although Henry's tackle was ridiculous. A great >>> free kick and an own goal is hardly a big endorsement for Wigan. >>> >>> Who's the new manager Rog? You never suggest anyone. >>> >>> On 2 October 2010 23:33, Marcus Chantry >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Trust the "We Love Mick" brigade enjoyed this performance. >>> >>> Get that thick yorkshire twat out of our club! BTMO! >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Sat Oct 02 15:35:25 2010 >>> >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> Starting in the Porterhouse about eight o'clock tonight >>> >>> It's on the corner of Riley St and Campbell St in Surry Hills, a >>> short walk from Central. >>> >>> Everyone welcome, including BTMO members. >>> >>> On 30 September 2010 14:58, Marcus Chantry >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Royal Exhibition (not Exchange) the venue that we used for our >>> monthly meetings. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> Sent: Thursday, 30 September 2010 1:32 PM >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> It's the one opposite central that we used to meet in on a Wednesday. >>> Dunno the street. >>> >>> On 30 September 2010 08:43, Paul Crowe >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Morning Steve, >>> >>> >>> >>> I have my Gladesville Sharks football end of season get together on >>> Saturday, hence my attempt to move the venue. >>> >>> >>> >>> If not too pissed, as I am golfing in the afternoon as well, I will >>> try to make it over to the Royal Exchange. What street is the Pub on please? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul. >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul Crowe >>> >>> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific >>> >>> >>> >>> ConTech (Sydney Office) >>> >>> >>> >>> PO Box 3517 >>> >>> Rhodes Waterside >>> >>> Rhodes NSW 2138 >>> >>> Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 >>> >>> Mob: 0406009562 >>> >>> Email: [email protected] >>> >>> Website: www.contechengineering.com >>> >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2010 10:02 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> >>> >>> Not much interest from the group Jimmy. I think BTMO might having >>> their own wake for this one. >>> >>> Let's say the RE is the venue for the game and I'll sort something >>> out with you, Matt and Elliot for a few pre drinks >>> >>> On 29 September 2010 16:30, james graves <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> i'm happy to meet somewhere first for a couple,then royal ex for the >>> game ,and if the doormen let me in,a couple for the road some place else... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:05:14 +1000 >>> Subject: Re: [BTMO] Re: Wigan - Roll Call >>> From: [email protected] >>> >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> Two ideas >>> >>> >>> >>> Royal Exhibition >>> >>> Glenmore >>> >>> >>> >>> Matt says that they will put the sound on in the Exhibition, but that >>> it will be quiet. Glenmore will be more lively but do they show >>> games with sound now it's been ponced up? >>> >>> On 28 September 2010 09:58, Paul Butcher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Can't make Saturday guys as I'm in Melbourne for the weekend........ >>> enjoy >>> >>> On Sep 27, 5:44 pm, james graves <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > i'm up for a few beers. >>> > >>> > Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:58:36 +1000 >>> > Subject: [BTMO] Wigan - Roll Call >>> >>> > From: [email protected] >>> >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > >>> > Who's coming out for this on Saturday? >>> > >>> > Confirmed: >>> > >>> > Steve M >>> > Elliot >>> > Matt L >>> > Paul C >>> > >>> > Anyone else? Venue to be confirmed based on who is coming. >>> > -- >>> > Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are >>> not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the >>> information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. >>> Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached >>> files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may >>> not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out! >> > > > > -- > Q: Why is this email three sentences or less? > A: http://three.sentenc.es > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! >
-- Q: Why is this email three sentences or less? A: http://three.sentenc.es -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
