Mark, Rog is just anti-Mick.  You can't persuade him otherwise.  He's still
be moaning if we won a treble of trebles back to back

Once Marcus comes over to the fold though, Rog will find it very lonely and
will convert then.



On 17 March 2011 14:37, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote:

> If MM has the talent of a chair leg, what does that make Ferguson, Mancini,
> Hodgson and Ancelotti and their teams then, all beaten by MM this season ?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Rog & Reet <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  No matter what “better players” were in a Mick squad we’d still be
>> battling relegation.
>>
>> Anybody with a hint of talent is either buggered off, Bothroyd, or spend
>> an eternity in the reserves, Milijas.
>>
>> Instead we’re lumbered with mediocre huffers and puffers and told we’re
>> aiming to finish 17th.
>>
>> Got the ambition, adventure and talent of a chair leg.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
>> Behalf Of *mark worrall
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 March 2011 3:58 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM
>> [sec=unclassified]
>>
>>
>>
>> “He has built this club how the fans wanted to see it – prior to Mick
>> coming here, people used to say ‘the players don’t play for the shirt.’"
>>
>>
>>
>> ...is very true. Everyone used to complain about slack performances, and
>> wasters. Now MM has every player putting in a 100% shift every week, playing
>> near beyond their ability.
>>
>>
>>
>> Would be interesting to see what he could do with better players.
>>
>>
>>
>> Read more:
>> http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2011/03/15/jez-moxey-reveals-wolves-ambitions/#ixzz1GjXpsN7D
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Morris, Lee SGT <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I'd be very happy to say something similar...but not forever...maybe not
>> even for a "long time"
>>
>>
>>
>> Incidentally I read somewhere that Villa have a defensive crisis ahead of
>> our game?
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
>> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 March 2011 13:19
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM
>>
>> A win at Villa this weekend and you'll be having to say "Thanks goodness
>> we've got Mick forever"
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16 March 2011 11:50, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2011/03/15/jez-moxey-reveals-wolves-ambitions/
>>
>>
>>
>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
>> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
>> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
>> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
>> Macquarie.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
>>
>> --
>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
>>
>> --
>> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
>> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
>>
>
> --
> Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
> A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
>

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

Reply via email to