Im a bit p*ssed with MM, as it used to be hard to worship him, then he went and spoilt it by going and beating Man City, Liverpool, Chelsea and Man Utd. Now it's too easy.
At least we have Henry, Ward, Stearman and Fletcher to keep us grounded. On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Marcus Chantry < [email protected]> wrote: > I did watch a few Ipswich games but they are worse than Wolves so now I’m > committed to following Wolves and have even pledged to support Thick Mick, > if we get more than 4 away points and stay up. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *mark worrall > *Sent:* Thursday, 17 March 2011 4:17 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM > [sec=unclassified] > > > > Lol. But I thought I remember reading something about Marcus going back to > supporting Ipswich ? > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Mark, Rog is just anti-Mick. You can't persuade him otherwise. He's still > be moaning if we won a treble of trebles back to back > > > > Once Marcus comes over to the fold though, Rog will find it very lonely and > will convert then. > > > > > > On 17 March 2011 14:37, mark worrall <[email protected]> wrote: > > If MM has the talent of a chair leg, what does that make Ferguson, Mancini, > Hodgson and Ancelotti and their teams then, all beaten by MM this season ? > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > No matter what “better players” were in a Mick squad we’d still be battling > relegation. > > Anybody with a hint of talent is either buggered off, Bothroyd, or spend an > eternity in the reserves, Milijas. > > Instead we’re lumbered with mediocre huffers and puffers and told we’re > aiming to finish 17th. > > Got the ambition, adventure and talent of a chair leg. > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *mark worrall > *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 March 2011 3:58 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM > [sec=unclassified] > > > > “He has built this club how the fans wanted to see it – prior to Mick > coming here, people used to say ‘the players don’t play for the shirt.’" > > > > ...is very true. Everyone used to complain about slack performances, and > wasters. Now MM has every player putting in a 100% shift every week, playing > near beyond their ability. > > > > Would be interesting to see what he could do with better players. > > > > Read more: > http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2011/03/15/jez-moxey-reveals-wolves-ambitions/#ixzz1GjXpsN7D > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Morris, Lee SGT < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I'd be very happy to say something similar...but not forever...maybe not > even for a "long time" > > > > Incidentally I read somewhere that Villa have a defensive crisis ahead of > our game? > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 March 2011 13:19 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] looks like we're stuck with MM > > A win at Villa this weekend and you'll be having to say "Thanks goodness > we've got Mick forever" > > > > On 16 March 2011 11:50, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > http://www.expressandstar.com/sport/wolverhampton-wanderers-fc/2011/03/15/jez-moxey-reveals-wolves-ambitions/ > > > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
