I raise Paul Ince because in spite of my repeated requests for you to suggest an alternative to Mick, Ince and Richard Money are the only two that you've ever suggested. (Money is currently unemployed, by the way, after leaving conference side Luton Town last year).
If you know so much about what makes a good football manager, how come you got it so wrong about those two? Why don't you put another couple of suggestions forward now, and we'll track their careers into oblivion too. My detailed analysis of away performance is that it's not the away fixture iteself but actual distance that's important. We got good results at Villa, Stoke and West Brom but clearly Newcastle is a long way away so we got the worst possible result there. It was a mathematical certainty. On 4 April 2011 08:12, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: > Forget Paul Ince, he’s not our manager and never will be. This is simply > a diversionary tactic to avoid discussing Thick Mick’s own inadequacies. > > > > As Roger & I are the only ones who don’t support Thick Mick, there should > be plenty of people on this list who can explain to me his tactics in > Saturday’s game? It’s strange how there’s been no discussion on this at > all. Does silence indicate that he is indefensible? > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 4 April 2011 5:31 AM > *To:* nswolves > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Ince > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/12951734.stm > > > Is this now sufficient proof that he would have been rubbish as Wolves > manager? > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
