Thank-you. Now can you suggest a couple of other managers that you would have in to replace Mick please? I feel unfair in asking you as it will surely be the kiss-of-death for them but we should see anyway.
Perhaps Mick got the tactics wrong for this game. I don't feel the need to defend him for a single game, nor would I use the wins against Chelsea, Liverpool, Man Utd etc to claim that he is a master tactician. If I could explain it at all it's the experiement of trying to work our how to play with Doyle out of the side. Which specific tactics did you most take umbrage with? On 4 April 2011 08:39, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote: > I am willing to admit that both Ince and Mooney have failed to deliver at > their respective clubs, however, I am not aware of their individual > circumstances with regards to playing personnel, funds available to them, > the level of control they may been given to influence the directions of > their clubs. How will we ever know how either of them would have performed > with better quality players and money available to re-build. It is a > hypothetical discussion that should be had during the off-season. > > > > As for now I want to discuss something that is very real (although quite > unbelievable) and that is the fate of Wolves under the guidance of one Magic > Mick/Thick Mick depending on which way you view him. Again, assuming you > watched the match Steve, how can you explain & support his tactics on the > weekend? I don’t know as much as you might think I do about football > management but receiving an explanation on Saturday’s match will very much > help with my education, as clearly I must have missed some vital concept or > tactic. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 4 April 2011 8:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Ince > > > > I raise Paul Ince because in spite of my repeated requests for you to > suggest an alternative to Mick, Ince and Richard Money are the only two that > you've ever suggested. (Money is currently unemployed, by the way, after > leaving conference side Luton Town last year). > > > > If you know so much about what makes a good football manager, how come you > got it so wrong about those two? Why don't you put another couple of > suggestions forward now, and we'll track their careers into oblivion too. > > > > My detailed analysis of away performance is that it's not the away fixture > iteself but actual distance that's important. We got good results at Villa, > Stoke and West Brom but clearly Newcastle is a long way away so we got the > worst possible result there. It was a mathematical certainty. > > > > > > On 4 April 2011 08:12, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Forget Paul Ince, he’s not our manager and never will be. This is simply a > diversionary tactic to avoid discussing Thick Mick’s own inadequacies. > > > > As Roger & I are the only ones who don’t support Thick Mick, there should > be plenty of people on this list who can explain to me his tactics in > Saturday’s game? It’s strange how there’s been no discussion on this at > all. Does silence indicate that he is indefensible? > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 4 April 2011 5:31 AM > *To:* nswolves > *Subject:* [NSWolves] Ince > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/12951734.stm > > > > Is this now sufficient proof that he would have been rubbish as Wolves > manager? > > -- > > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > > -- > Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? > A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked. > -- Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be? A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
