That's right, because the storks, being tall birds, generally play in defence.
Swifts on the other hand tend to be wingers. Owls read the game well, but they are more of a fair-weather bird and are not well suited to English winters. On 2 November 2011 08:03, LEESE Matthew <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > Gained them Rog - I blame the storks for the ones we lost. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Rog & Reet > *Sent:* Wednesday, 2 November 2011 8:02 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Paul Crowe > > When we gained them or when we lost them?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew > *Sent:* Wednesday, 2 November 2011 7:34 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Paul Crowe**** > > ** ** > > What formation were we playing when we amassed those points?**** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Rog & Reet > *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 November 2011 9:54 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Paul Crowe**** > > Someone once “proved” that Mick was our most successful manager ever after > he collected 2 points out of 24.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 November 2011 8:12 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Paul Crowe**** > > ** ** > > But he only really plays in 451. > > Someone once "proved" that the birth rate in German districts was higher > when a lot of storks were present. Of course the storks were more present > in rural areas where the birth rate was higher. > > The good analyst will be aware that correlation doesn't mean causation and > will look for further evidence that helps to isolate the variables. This > analysis failed to do that. > > ** > ****** > > On 1 November 2011 20:01, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > It makes no mention of formations at all. What Paul's email illustrates is > that wolves perform better when milijas plays. > > **** > > *From*: Steven Millward [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent*: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 07:36 PM > *To*: nswolves <[email protected]> > *Subject*: [NSWolves] Paul Crowe > **** > > Paul, your email got caught in the spam filter. I set it to post but it > is taking some time to come through. > > In summary though, it showed that Wolves perform better when they play 451 > rather than 442. Interesting stats paul.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not > the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not > guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or > opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or > opinions of Macquarie.**** > > **** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > ** ** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > [image: Logo]**** > > Before printing, please consider the environment**** > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only > to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may > contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is > waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime > Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this > e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you > receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system > and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this > e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out.**** > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > [image: Logo] > > Before printing, please consider the environment > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only > to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may > contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is > waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime > Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this > e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you > receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system > and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this > e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
