Well said Sarge Sent from my iPhone
On 19/12/2011, at 10:00 AM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> wrote: > How can I explain this more clearly. > > 90% of the results are down to the quality of players > We have the fourth worst players in the league. > We have no right to finish above where we currently sit > If we look bad in matches it's because we are playing against better players > > Why do you keep saying its all Mick's fault? > > > On 19 December 2011 09:55, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> wrote: > UNCLASSIFIED > > To be fair, Steve Morgan needs to address the situation too. > > Wolves perfromances on the pitch have shown little or no improvement, the > manager has to be responsible for that. > > The big fear for me is, we change managers and still get relegated, and so it > all starts again. > > IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and > is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you > have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender > and delete the email. > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Steven Millward > Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 08:35 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > Anyone read Soccernomics? I've read extracts but I've just ordered it. The > author says that 90% of Premier league position is down to wages. > > I really don't understand why Mick is the scapegoat. He has the fourth > cheapest wage bill and the team is fourth from bottom. > > If the fans really cared they'd offer to pay double the season ticket price > to fund better players. > > Hmmm. > > > On 19 December 2011 09:04, Paul Crowe <[email protected]> wrote: > Spoke to me Dad last night, who is a season ticket holder in the Steve Bull, > apparently Tuesday night against Norwich could be the "last chance saloon > game" for MM. He reckons another loss would see the fans turn against him on > mass! > > Paul Crowe > Sales Manager - Asia Pacific > > ConTech (Sydney Office) > > PO Box 3517 > Rhodes Waterside > Rhodes NSW 2138 > Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542 > Mob: 0406009562 > Email: [email protected] > Website: www.contechengineering.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Morris, Lee SGT > Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 8:01 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > UNCLASSIFIED > > Apparrantly the fans left him alone this week. > > My season ticket holding mate seems to think many fans are resigned to > the fact that his job is safe, but that can change very quickly. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Paul Hart > Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 06:55 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? > > Did MM get any abuse ? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 18/12/2011, at 4:22 AM, "paul " <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > At least Doyle scored. > > > > Sent via BlackBerry(r) from Telstra > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "mark worrall" <[email protected]> > > Sender: [email protected] > > Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:05:48 > > To: <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? > > > > Passing is atrocious. Henry needs to stop the 50 yard speculative > > passes that go straight to Stoke players. Even the short easy passes > > are going to their players. > > > > Stoke are the dirtiest team in the league. Nasty tackles, elbows, > > shoving, etc even makes Berra look ok. I hope McCarthy calls them for > > who they really are. And the tactics won them the match in the 2nd > half. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Marcus Chantry > > Sent: Sunday, 18 December 2011 2:36 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Anyone watching? > > > > Bad scoreline now and we're creating nothing. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On 18/12/2011, at 3:03 AM, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Good scoreline but quality of game could be better, especially the > > crossing. Fletcher hasn't been in the game which is surprising. > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> -- > >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence > and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. > If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact > the sender and delete the email. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
