Has Dave Jones got himself another job yet? There's a Manager called Mark McGhee who gets good wraps at Bristol Rovers.
On 13/02/2012, at 10:24 PM, Paul Hart wrote: > Sorry meant to say Graham turner > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 13/02/2012, at 10:16 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > >> Stuart Pearce? christ almighty, Bring back Mick!! >> >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 10:14 PM, Paul Hart wrote: >> >>> Stuart Pearce >>> Alan curbishley >>> Grahame souness >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:11 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic >>>> names down as replacements >>>> >>>> On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>> He's GONE!!!!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Clipboard in charge. Lol >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I >>>>>>> watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the first >>>>>>> time I have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one >>>>>>> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in my >>>>>>> fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the >>>>>>> first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second >>>>>>> and got absolutely flogged. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we >>>>>>> had Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how >>>>>>> anyone can say we lack pace. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of >>>>>>> the night has anything to do with it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing >>>>>>> isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick >>>>>>> and Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it >>>>>>> was unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to >>>>>>> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' >>>>>>> means you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our >>>>>>> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday >>>>>>> who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many >>>>>>> were fighting amongst themselves. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there >>>>>>> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress >>>>>>> this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of >>>>>>> progress so people should be entitled to criticize. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line >>>>>>> with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, >>>>>>> even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon >>>>>>> during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. >>>>>>> We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us >>>>>>> this year. So what? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of >>>>>>> the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go >>>>>>> and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps >>>>>>> the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA >>>>>>> <jpar...@munichre.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>>> Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> UNCLASSIFIED >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A bit late. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence >>>>>>> and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >>>>>>> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >>>>>>> contact the sender and delete the email. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>>> Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>>>>>> >>>>>>> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >>>>>>> protest demanding Mick's head. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should have been 6 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>>>>>> Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >>>>>>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sorry, 5 at home. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at >>>>>>> home? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from >>>>>>> defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >>>>>>> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>>>>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and >>>>>>> may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich >>>>>>> Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or >>>>>>> other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual >>>>>>> sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states >>>>>>> them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will >>>>>>> not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance >>>>>>> upon the contents of this message. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > -- > Boo! Clipboard out! -- Boo! Clipboard out!
