I'd like to see if any of you are brave enough to put three realistic names down as replacements
On 13/02/2012, at 10:07 PM, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > He's GONE!!!!! > > > > On 13/02/2012, at 22:04 , Steven Millward wrote: > >> Clipboard in charge. Lol >> >> On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote: >> >>> Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I watched >>> this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn’t). It is the first time I have >>> EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn’t. >>> >>> Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one >>> clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he’s in my >>> fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas? >>> >>> Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the first >>> half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and got >>> absolutely flogged. >>> >>> >>> >>> There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don’t care if we had >>> Tevez and Ronaldo up front – they’d catch cold. >>> >>> >>> >>> I’m not for changing managers – but I soon will be L >>> >>> >>> >>> Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf Of Steven Millward >>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>> >>> >>> >>> I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone >>> can say we lack pace. >>> >>> I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the >>> night has anything to do with it. >>> >>> Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't >>> it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan >>> said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was >>> unrealistic to think we'd improve much. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>> >>> I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to >>> watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means >>> you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our >>> ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who >>> felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were >>> fighting amongst themselves. >>> >>> >>> >>> After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there >>> would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this >>> season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so >>> people should be entitled to criticize. >>> >>> >>> >>> However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with >>> our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if >>> progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon >>> during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We >>> thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. >>> So what? >>> >>> >>> >>> It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the >>> Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and >>> support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem >>> Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA <jpar...@munichre.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. >>> >>> Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. >>> >>> Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT >>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] >>> >>> >>> >>> UNCLASSIFIED >>> >>> A bit late. >>> >>> >>> >>> Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men >>> >>> >>> >>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and >>> is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you >>> have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender >>> and delete the email. >>> >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>> >>> apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of >>> protest demanding Mick's head. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Should have been 6 >>> >>> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On >>> Behalf Of Marcus Chantry >>> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM >>> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies >>> >>> sorry, 5 at home. >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? >>> >>> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to >>> midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is >>> confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may >>> be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group >>> will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. >>> Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where >>> the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the >>> Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action >>> taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this >>> message. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Thick Mick Out. >> >> >> -- >> Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
