As you all take your knives out and wipe them clean, dont forget, as Moxey said...
"We have been on a journey for the last five-and-half-years of outstanding success - more than this club has seen in a generation and we have achieved our objectives." From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:02 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Well he's been sacked. You all got what you wanted On 13/02/2012, at 7:02 PM, "Jeremy Tonks" <to...@hotkey.net.au> wrote: Another sad watershed in my long Wolves hair shirt experience. I watched this morning (and genuinely wished I hadn't). It is the first time I have EVER watched Wolves and wished I hadn't. Frankly it was embarrassing. Hennessy was the stand out (and he had one clanger). Johnston hopefully got an assist for one goal (he's in my fantasy team L). What is MM trying to do to Fletcher and Miljas? Nothing worked and we were woeful in the first half. Abysmal in the first half. I hate to say it but we were actually better in the second and got absolutely flogged. There is no midfield and our defense is pathetic. I don't care if we had Tevez and Ronaldo up front - they'd catch cold. I'm not for changing managers - but I soon will be L Matthew Leese makes very good sense in his lengthy email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 6:51 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace. I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with it. Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much. On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry <chant...@iinet.net.au> wrote: I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves. After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so people should be entitled to criticize. However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com> wrote: Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA <jpar...@munichre.com> wrote: I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. _____ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. _____ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. _____ CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Clipboard out!
