My feeling is Morgan will finish his housing project and then get the flock out 
! He has no real interest in our club ! 

Sent from my iPhone

On 21/02/2012, at 1:58 PM, Steven Millward <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can't think what else it could be but money that put Curbishley off
>  
> Really, the Prem is not a place to be tight with money.  Morgan should find a 
> buyer if he hasn't got the stomach for it.  Unless the FFP rules change 
> things there's little point trying to compete.
>  
> 
>  
> On 21 February 2012 13:54, Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> wrote:
> UNCLASSIFIED
> 
> They haven't got a f-ckin clue.
>  
> Its the same as when we are trying to sign players.......We aren't going 
> anywhere until they release the purse strings a little more...I bet our water 
> tight budget is what put Curbishley off.
> 
> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and 
> is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you 
> have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender 
> and delete the email.
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Steven Millward
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:46
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NSWolves] RE: The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> 
> It's looking more like Morgan had a bust up with Mick and lost his blob.  
> Good business sense that.
>  
> 
>  
> On 21 February 2012 10:59, LEESE Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
> I honestly (foolishly?) believed that someone would have been sounded out 
> before Mick was sacked and that we'd have seen a quick turnaround. A good 
> opportunity to get someone in and have some extra time with the squad due to 
> no game last weekend has been missed. Maybe we won't see anyone before the 
> weekend and it'll be TC looking lost and glancing to his left for 
> instruction, only to realise Mick ain't there.
>  
> In terms of the number of names being thrown about I take this as a sign that 
> there's not much being 'leaked' from Molineux and that it's the press who 
> don't have a clue, and so are making assumptions to get their stories.
>  
> The fact that one of the 'official' bits of info to come out is that they are 
> conducting second interviews is a bit worrying and suggests no-one really 
> impressed first time round. If the names being thrown about are anything to 
> go by, that's not really surprising though.
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Morris, Lee SGT
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:23 AM
> 
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NSWolves] The search [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> 
> UNCLASSIFIED
> 
> Starting to get a little disheartened with the search for a new manager now.
>  
> So much for good planning......
>  
> A new name mentioned every five minutes...we really haven't got a clue...
>  
> Poyet, McDermott, Holloway, Clarke, Keane, Hughton, Bruce.....not exactly 
> inspiring...think i'd take McDermott.
>  
>  
> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and 
> is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you 
> have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender 
> and delete the email.
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> 
> 
> Before printing, please consider the environment
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to 
> be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain 
> legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or 
> lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) 
> is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or 
> attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
> sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail 
> in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the 
> sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are 
> not the intended recipient.
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!
> 
> -- 
> Boo! Curbishley out!

-- 
Boo! Curbishley out!

Reply via email to