> First of all, I > don't think he is even using Exchange server as a back end.
First of all, I don't *HAVE* to. Outlook interfaces with Exchange *or* acts as a POP client. > (hence all the "client" side issues) I think he "mis"-sent > this mail to the list. He must have meant to send this to an > Outlook discussion list. I don't think he knows the > difference between a server based rules and client based > rules, because he probably has it configured to POP from a > *nix mail server. And why wouldn't I? At least it wouldn't be crashing and using up 90% of my system resources. > It sure will take some time to open a > 800MB PST file on his local hard drive, I will guarantee it. You are darn right about that, and I've been considering cutting it back, however it's nice to know that Outlook can handle a large volume of archived mail, isn't it. I don't want to make matters worse, but didn't you notice how much more thought out and appropriate my quoting style was in comparison to yours? It wasn't necessary to quote Missy's entire email because you were already replying to a discussion list. You needed only quote the relevant portions and then continue your follow up afterward. Adam ************** Email Confidentiality Clause ************** The information contained within this email and its attachments is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please return it to the originator advising of the error and delete all copies of it from your system. ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
