Hmmmmm, my exchange server runs flawlessly, and all my outlook 2k users love their email client, as do I. Hope you get your issues worked out!
Anybody out their find Outlook 2002 to work more efficient over a modem/VPN connection, I am getting ready to test this scenario. -Laters, TOny -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:13 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000/2002 There is a reason that people keep the thread in the email. Now you chopped it up, people wouldn't be able to see what a fool you've made youself here. Missy was being so nice to have completely read your mail, and attempted to help you with some of your issues. What a waste of her time... Btw, this is a NT/2000 discussion list, do you have a question or comment on either or not? Find somewhere else to file your "silly" outlook cries... Or pick some other program to use if you "hate" it so much, even though most of your "hatred" came from your own ignorance. P.s. this is my last transmission on this thread, as I don't want to waste any more of my time. So, don't even bother to keep the flame up. Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -----Original Message----- From: Adam Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:46 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: MS Outlook 2000/2002 Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000/2002 > First of all, I > don't think he is even using Exchange server as a back end. First of all, I don't *HAVE* to. Outlook interfaces with Exchange *or* acts as a POP client. > (hence all the "client" side issues) I think he "mis"-sent > this mail to the list. He must have meant to send this to an > Outlook discussion list. I don't think he knows the > difference between a server based rules and client based > rules, because he probably has it configured to POP from a > *nix mail server. And why wouldn't I? At least it wouldn't be crashing and using up 90% of my system resources. > It sure will take some time to open a > 800MB PST file on his local hard drive, I will guarantee it. You are darn right about that, and I've been considering cutting it back, however it's nice to know that Outlook can handle a large volume of archived mail, isn't it. I don't want to make matters worse, but didn't you notice how much more thought out and appropriate my quoting style was in comparison to yours? It wasn't necessary to quote Missy's entire email because you were already replying to a discussion list. You needed only quote the relevant portions and then continue your follow up afterward. Adam ************** Email Confidentiality Clause ************** The information contained within this email and its attachments is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please return it to the originator advising of the error and delete all copies of it from your system. ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
