I'm with Adam - so many questions, so few answers... I can't see a legit reason why a sysadmin would want to "sheild" their PDC from staff, who presumably they set up, give access to, etc.
Are permissions no longer good enough for internal protection? themolk. > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Smith [mailto:adam.smith@;sageautomation.com] > Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 1:05 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Moving PDC behind firewall > > > > > Everyone has asked why, here's the reason: > > > > > It's clear (to me at least)the "trusted" LAN is being redefined. > > > > We're wanting to insulate the PDC from the users. > > I'm still not clear as to exactly WHAT it is you want to shield it > *from*? > > Internal DOS attacks? H4XX0riZiNG? Port Scanning? > > > > > > -- > Adam Smith > Information Technology Officer > SAGE Automation Ltd. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.sageautomation.com > > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
