Nah - the PDC will work fine without any open Firewall ports. The BDCs are another story entirely, however.
------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:ListMember@;UltraTech-llc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:23 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Moving PDC behind firewall > > > For the PDC to work at all, you'll need to open up a few ports... > > > ASB > Technology Integration Specialist > http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-nt2000-136492@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of /dev/null > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 12:59 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: Re: Moving PDC behind firewall > > > Thanks everyone for the info on this admittedly weird request. > > Everyone has asked why, here's the reason: > > > It's clear (to me at least)the "trusted" LAN is being redefined. > > We're wanting to insulate the PDC from the users. > > Ed Esgro said "PDC will run but it will not be the master browser for > your 10.x.x.x network it will be the master browser for your 192.x.x.x > network". If we put the PDC and user computers on the same logical > (10.*) network with this firewall/router in-between the PDC and users > and set the firewall/router to only forward the protocols we wanted, > would this allow the PDC to be the master browser? I'm assuming the > answer is yes. > > Thanks again for everyone's help. > > > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
