You have enough machines to play with both, but ISA will groan on some of those boxes, where OBSD will be more than pleased.
ASB http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Okunoren, Tunde (CSC) Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:53 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Kinda OT -- Firewall servers and the like (home use) pretty interesting threads going on but I too want to keep this back on track.... I have a few old pcs - dual P90, p133, p166 & pII233 doing absolutely nothing. Also have a little NAT Netgear acting as a Firewall\Router. So which way should I swing :- WIN2K with ISA or Openbsd (not familiar with either, but fastracking from NT4 to WIN2K). Finally apart from using the remaining boxes as browser machines what other use can I put them too. Cheers.......... -----Original Message----- From: Len Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2002 13:30 To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Kinda OT -- Firewall servers and the like (home use) * Please Note : This message was received from the Internet * _____________________________________________________________ >Actually, in practice Free has been less secure. Not as much less as >the penguin, but less than OpenBSD. There *is* a reason OBSD has a very >unique moniker with respect to their default install. hey, a *BSD pissing match on an MS list! :)) obsd is more secure, but "in practice" fbsd is just as good, esp for the situation discussed. Anyway, I doubt hardly anybody here wants to get into *nix at all anyway. :)) Len ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
