What about creating replica's. How about migrating to SQL Server which is tuned for large databases like this. Access id generally good for db's under 2Gigs.
I trust you regularly compress this db:) Hilary 973 254-8140 732 687-2264 (cell) 888-236-8061 (pager) -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:38 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Terminal Services and VPN or VPN Alone I think you'll find the performance of an 88MB Access database across WAN to be unacceptable. TS is a good solution. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Carmine Poliandro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:40 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: Terminal Services and VPN or VPN Alone I am new to TS. I am trying to implement a remote connection infrastructure. � The company runs an Access DB. � Does it make sense to use VPN and have the users open Access locally and run the DB across the connection? Or, have them use VPN w/TS and run the DB local to the server? � I'm looking for some feedback on best practices as well as cost considerations. � Please assume that all remote connections are DSL/Cable and that the maximum number of remote concurrent users is 10. The DB is approximately 88MB. � Thanks in advance. � Carmine Poliandro ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=nt2000&text_mode=&lang=e nglish To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=nt2000&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=nt2000&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
