Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman
characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is
still the hbox wrapper.
David
> Adam Lindsay wrote:
>
> > \startmathcollection[default] %eventual patch for math-tex?
> > \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mi] ["61]
> > \definemathcharacter [b] [nothing] [mi] ["62]
> > \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mi] ["63]
> > \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mi] ["64]
> > \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mi] ["65]
> ...
>
> Interesting. With these definitions in place, getting mixed bold in cmr
> math is a lot better, too...
>
> \definetypeface [] [mm] [bfmath] [computer-modern] [computer-modern]
> \setupformulas [method=bold]
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
> n({\bfm a} + {\bfm b}) = {\bfm \Gamma}
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> Now, do digits ever get bold-ed in mixed bold and regular math?
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
