David Munger wrote: > Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman > characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is > still the hbox wrapper.
Okay. What do you mean by "can't get roman characters"? Can you give an minimal example? adam >> Adam Lindsay wrote: >> >>> \startmathcollection[default] %eventual patch for math-tex? >>> \definemathcharacter [a] [nothing] [mi] ["61] >>> \definemathcharacter [b] [nothing] [mi] ["62] >>> \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mi] ["63] >>> \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mi] ["64] >>> \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mi] ["65] >> ... >> >> Interesting. With these definitions in place, getting mixed bold in cmr >> math is a lot better, too... >> >> \definetypeface [] [mm] [bfmath] [computer-modern] [computer-modern] >> \setupformulas [method=bold] >> >> \starttext >> \startformula >> n({\bfm a} + {\bfm b}) = {\bfm \Gamma} >> \stopformula >> \stoptext >> >> Now, do digits ever get bold-ed in mixed bold and regular math? > > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context